Skip to main content

MISSISSIPPI EMPLOYMENT SEC. COM'N v. Danner

MISSCTAPPMarch 16, 2004No. 2003-CC-00810-COACited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
McMillin, C.J., Bridges and Griffis
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Mississippi Court of Appeals reversed the circuit court's decision and reinstated the Commission's finding that the employee was terminated for misconduct under the no-call, no-show policy and is therefore ineligible for unemployment benefits.

What This Ruling Means

# Mississippi Employment Security Commission v. Danner **What Happened** An employee at Sam's Town Hotel and Gambling Casino was fired for not showing up to work and not calling to explain the absence. The employee then applied for unemployment benefits. The initial court decision allowed the employee to receive these benefits, but the employer's insurance company disagreed. **What the Court Decided** Mississippi's Court of Appeals sided with the employer. The court ruled that the employee was terminated for misconduct because they violated the casino's no-call, no-show policy. As a result, the employee was not eligible to collect unemployment benefits. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case reinforces that employers can deny unemployment benefits to workers fired for breaking workplace attendance policies. Workers should understand that simply failing to appear for work—without notification—is considered serious misconduct in most states. If you cannot work, communicating with your employer can be crucial to protecting your eligibility for unemployment benefits if you're terminated.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.