No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's summary judgment in favor of the Pension Fund and Trustees, upholding the suspension of Cirincione's pension benefits because he remained re-employed by his company while receiving retirement benefits, violating the Plan's re-employment provisions.
Cirincione v. Plumbers Local Union No. 200 Pension Fund
What Happened
Cirincione, a retired plumber, received pension benefits from his union's retirement plan. However, he continued working for his former employer while collecting these retirement payments. The Pension Fund discovered this arrangement and suspended his benefits, claiming he violated the plan's rules about re-employment.
What the Court Decided
The appeals court sided with the Pension Fund. The judges confirmed that suspending Cirincione's pension benefits was legal and appropriate because he had violated the plan's re-employment conditions by working while retired.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case is important for union workers and retirees because it confirms that pension plans can enforce rules about working after retirement. If you receive pension benefits, you should carefully review your plan's requirements about re-employment. Working for your former employer while collecting retirement benefits could result in losing those payments. Workers need to understand these restrictions before accepting pension benefits to avoid unexpected financial consequences.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.