Skip to main content

Country Ford Trucks, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. CircuitOctober 27, 2000No. 99-1529Cited 27 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Ginsburg, Henderson, Sentelle
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The D.C. Circuit affirmed the NLRB's determination that a bargaining unit of service technicians and lube workers at one facility was appropriate, and upheld the Board's finding that Country Ford violated the NLRA by refusing to bargain and provide union-requested information.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Country Ford Trucks refused to negotiate with a union that had been officially certified to represent its workers. The company also refused to provide the union with information it needed for bargaining purposes. Country Ford argued that the group of workers the union represented (called a "bargaining unit") wasn't properly defined, giving them grounds to avoid negotiations. **What the Court Decided** The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) against Country Ford. The court confirmed that the bargaining unit was appropriate and that Country Ford had no valid legal reason to refuse bargaining with the union or to withhold the requested information. The company was required to negotiate in good faith and provide the necessary information to the union. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling reinforces workers' fundamental rights to union representation. When a union is officially certified, employers cannot simply refuse to negotiate by challenging the makeup of worker groups. Employers must also share relevant information that unions need to effectively represent workers during contract negotiations. This decision protects workers' collective bargaining rights and ensures employers cannot delay or avoid negotiations through unfounded legal challenges.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.