Skip to main content

S.A. Storer & Sons Co. v. Secretary of Labor

D.C. CircuitMarch 19, 2004No. 02-1307Cited 7 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Henderson, Tatel, Roberts
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission's order affirming OSHA's citation against S.A. Storer & Sons Co. for fall protection violations and remanded the case for further proceedings, finding that the Secretary of Labor had erroneously interpreted the applicable OSHA regulations regarding the overhand bricklaying exception.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** S.A. Storer & Sons Co., a construction company, was cited by OSHA (the Occupational Safety and Health Administration) for violating fall protection safety rules. The company was doing bricklaying work and argued they qualified for a special exception in OSHA regulations called the "overhand bricklaying exception," which allows certain types of bricklaying work to be done without standard fall protection equipment. OSHA disagreed and issued the citation anyway. The company challenged this citation. **What the Court Decided** The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the company and sent the case back to be reconsidered. The court found that the Secretary of Labor and OSHA had misinterpreted the regulations about when the overhand bricklaying exception applies. The court didn't make a final ruling on whether the company actually violated safety rules, but said the original decision was based on the wrong understanding of the law. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights the ongoing tension between workplace safety requirements and industry-specific exceptions. While the ruling may benefit some construction employers, it also shows that OSHA regulations can be complex and subject to different interpretations, potentially affecting how safety rules are enforced on job sites.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.