Skip to main content

Ceridian Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. CircuitJanuary 27, 2006No. 04-1421Cited 15 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Sentelle, Garland, Griffith
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit denied Ceridian's petition for review and granted the NLRB's cross-petition for enforcement, upholding the Board's finding that Ceridian violated the National Labor Relations Act by refusing to grant unpaid leave for bargaining while also refusing to negotiate during nonworking hours.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Ceridian Corporation, a payroll services company, was in a labor dispute with its workers' union over when contract negotiations could take place. The union wanted to negotiate during work hours and requested unpaid leave for employee representatives to participate. However, Ceridian refused to grant the unpaid leave but also wouldn't agree to hold negotiations outside of normal working hours. This created an impossible situation where negotiations couldn't happen at all. **What the Court Decided** The Court of Appeals sided with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) against Ceridian. The court found that the company violated federal labor law by essentially blocking negotiations entirely. By refusing both options - unpaid leave during work hours and after-hours negotiations - Ceridian made it impossible for workers to exercise their legal right to collective bargaining. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling protects workers' fundamental right to negotiate with their employers through unions. It establishes that companies can't use scheduling tactics to avoid bargaining altogether. Employers must provide reasonable opportunities for negotiations to occur, whether during work hours (with appropriate leave arrangements) or outside normal business hours. This ensures workers can meaningfully participate in contract discussions that affect their wages, benefits, and working conditions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.