Skip to main content

W & M Properties of Connecticut, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. CircuitFebruary 8, 2008No. 06-1365, 06-1395Cited 31 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Brown, Griffith, Edwards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationFailure to Accommodate

Outcome

The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied the employer's petition for review and granted the NLRB's cross-application for enforcement, upholding the Board's finding that the employer violated the NLRA by refusing to hire union members based on anti-union animus.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** W&M Properties of Connecticut, a company, refused to hire certain job applicants because they were union members. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) investigated and found that the company was discriminating against these workers simply because of their union membership, not because they were unqualified for the jobs. **What the Court Decided** The Court of Appeals sided with the NLRB against the company. The court upheld the Board's finding that W&M Properties violated federal labor law by refusing to hire people based on anti-union bias. The company had challenged this decision, but the court rejected their appeal and enforced the NLRB's ruling. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case reinforces an important protection for workers: employers cannot refuse to hire someone simply because they belong to a union. Federal law protects workers' rights to join unions and participate in union activities without facing job discrimination. If workers believe they've been denied employment because of their union membership, they can file complaints with the NLRB, which has the authority to investigate and take action against employers who break these rules.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.