Skip to main content

FABI CONST. CO., INC. v. Secretary of Labor

D.C. CircuitAugust 29, 2008No. 06-1244Cited 6 times
Plaintiff WinFabi Construction Company, Inc.$165,304.87 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Sentelle, Ginsburg, Brown
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Fabi Construction won a partial award of attorneys' fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The court awarded $165,304.87 in attorneys' fees and costs (reduced from the requested $569,031.38) after finding the Secretary of Labor's position was not substantially justified on certain OSHA violations.

What This Ruling Means

**Construction Company Wins Legal Fees After Fighting OSHA Violations** Fabi Construction Company was cited by the Department of Labor for workplace safety violations under OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) rules. The company disagreed with some of these citations and fought them in court, arguing that the government's case was weak and unfair. The court sided with Fabi Construction on several of the safety violations, finding that the Department of Labor couldn't properly justify its position on those specific citations. Because the government's case was found to be unreasonable, the court ordered the Department of Labor to pay $165,304.87 toward Fabi's legal fees and court costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act. This was less than the $569,031.38 the company requested, but still a significant award. **What This Means for Workers:** This case shows that employers can successfully challenge OSHA citations when they believe the government has overreached. While this might seem concerning for worker safety, it also demonstrates that the legal system requires OSHA to have solid evidence when citing employers. This helps ensure that safety regulations are enforced fairly and based on clear violations, which ultimately strengthens legitimate workplace safety protections for all workers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.