Skip to main content

Raymond F. Kravis Center for the Performing Arts, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. CircuitDecember 30, 2008No. 07-1419, 07-1459Cited 11 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Rogers, Garland, Kavanaugh
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The National Labor Relations Board's decision was upheld. The court denied Kravis Center's petition for review and granted the Board's cross-application for enforcement, finding that Kravis violated the NLRA by unilaterally changing the bargaining unit scope and withdrawing recognition from the union.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** The Raymond F. Kravis Center for the Performing Arts got into a dispute with the National Labor Relations Board over how it treated its workers' union. The Kravis Center made changes to which jobs were covered by the union contract and stopped recognizing the union as the workers' representative. The workers' union complained to the National Labor Relations Board, saying the arts center broke federal labor laws by making these changes without discussing them with the union first. **What the Court Decided** The court sided with the workers and the National Labor Relations Board. It ruled that the Kravis Center violated federal labor law by unilaterally changing the scope of jobs covered by union representation and by withdrawing recognition from the union. The court denied the Kravis Center's appeal and enforced the Labor Board's decision against the employer. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling reinforces that employers cannot simply decide on their own to change which jobs are covered by union contracts or stop working with legally recognized unions. Employers must follow proper procedures and negotiate with unions in good faith. Workers have legal protection when their employers try to undermine union representation without following the law.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.