Skip to main content

Taylor v. FIRST COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION

Tex. App.—14th Dist.July 29, 2010No. 14-09-00051-CVCited 24 times
Defendant WinTexan Automotive Inc.$54,741.18 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Kem Thompson Frost
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The trial court held Luis G. Taylor, as director and officer of Texan Automotive Inc., personally liable for the corporation's breach-of-contract debt to First Community Credit Union under Texas Tax Code sections 171.252 and 171.255. The appellate court affirmed the judgment.

What This Ruling Means

**Taylor v. First Community Credit Union: Corporate Officer Held Personally Liable for Company Debt** This case involved a dispute between First Community Credit Union and Luis Taylor, who served as a director and officer of Texan Automotive Inc. The credit union sued the company for breach of contract, seeking $54,741.18 in unpaid debt. When the company couldn't pay, the credit union went after Taylor personally, arguing he should be held responsible for the corporation's obligations. The court sided with the credit union. Both the trial court and appeals court ruled that Taylor could be held personally liable for his company's debt under specific Texas tax code provisions. The courts found that as a corporate director and officer, Taylor could not hide behind the corporate structure to avoid paying the company's contractual obligations. He was ordered to pay the full amount owed by his corporation. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that corporate executives and officers can sometimes be held personally responsible for their company's debts and obligations. While this case involved a debt dispute rather than employee wages, it demonstrates that courts may pierce the corporate veil when company leaders try to avoid legitimate financial responsibilities.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.