Skip to main content

Stevens v. Union Security Insurance

W.D. Va.June 3, 2008No. Civil Action 1:07cv00086
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Glen M. Williams
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Union Security Insurance's decision to deny accidental death and automobile accident benefits was affirmed on summary judgment. The court found the policy exclusion for intoxication-related deaths applied because the insured had a blood alcohol level of 0.227%, more than three times Virginia's legal limit, which directly precipitated the fatal motor vehicle accident.

What This Ruling Means

**Stevens v. Union Security Insurance: Court Upholds Denial of Death Benefits** This case involved a dispute over life insurance benefits after a worker died in a car accident. The deceased employee had life insurance through Union Security Insurance Company that included coverage for accidental death and automobile accidents. When the worker died in a car crash, his family filed a claim for these benefits. However, the insurance company denied the claim and refused to pay. The court sided with the insurance company. The judge found that the worker had a blood alcohol level of 0.227% at the time of the accident—more than three times Virginia's legal drinking limit of 0.08%. Because the insurance policy specifically excluded deaths related to intoxication, and the high blood alcohol level directly caused the fatal crash, the company was legally justified in denying benefits. **What this means for workers:** If you have life insurance through your employer, carefully read the policy exclusions. Many policies won't pay benefits if death results from intoxication, illegal activities, or other risky behaviors. Understanding these limitations helps you make informed decisions about additional coverage you might need and ensures your family knows what benefits they can expect.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.