Chase Home Finance LLC v. Higgins
Case Details
- Citation
- 2009 ME 136, 985 A.2d 508, 2009 Me. LEXIS 139, 2009 WL 5151316
- Judge(s)
- Saufley, Alexander, Levy, Silver, Mead, Gorman, Jabar
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- State
- Maine
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The Maine Supreme Court vacated the summary judgment of foreclosure in favor of Chase due to genuine issues of material fact regarding notice of default and amount owed, but affirmed summary judgment for Chase on the Higginses' counterclaims.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.