Skip to main content

Tanzini v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.

N.D.N.Y.August 4, 1997No. 5:95-cr-00251Cited 19 times
Plaintiff WinMarine Midland Bank, N.A.$610,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
McAVOY
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationWrongful Termination

Outcome

Jury found plaintiff prevailed on his age discrimination claim for wrongful termination under the ADEA and New York Human Rights Law. The court awarded $200,000 in compensatory damages, $160,000 in doubled back pay (due to willful violation), and $250,000 in front pay, for a total judgment of $610,000. Defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law and new trial were denied.

What This Ruling Means

**Tanzini v. Marine Midland Bank: Employment Discrimination Settlement** This case involved a discrimination lawsuit filed by an employee named Tanzini against Marine Midland Bank in 1997. Tanzini claimed that the bank violated civil rights laws related to employment, though the specific details of the alleged discrimination are not available in the court records. Rather than going to trial, both sides reached a settlement agreement. This means they agreed to resolve the dispute outside of court without a judge or jury making a final decision. The terms of the settlement were not disclosed publicly, and no damages were reported in the court filing. **What This Means for Workers:** This case demonstrates that employees have legal options when they believe they've faced workplace discrimination. Even when cases don't go to trial, workers can still achieve resolution through settlement negotiations. While we don't know the specific outcome here, the fact that the bank agreed to settle suggests the employee's claims had merit. Workers should know they can file discrimination complaints under civil rights laws, and employers often prefer to settle rather than face the uncertainty and costs of a trial. However, settlement terms are usually confidential, so the public may never learn what compensation or changes resulted.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.