Skip to main content

Dominguez v. Quigley's Irish Pub, Inc.

N.D. Ill.May 24, 2011No. 09-cv-2583Cited 16 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Jeffrey Cole
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Fair Labor Standards Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftWrongful Termination

Outcome

The court granted plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, finding that the employer failed to pay minimum wages and overtime as required by the FLSA and Illinois Minimum Wage Law. The employer's frequent and undisputed alterations of employee time records to reduce compensable hours constituted violations.

What This Ruling Means

**Restaurant Workers Win Case Over Altered Time Records** This case involved employees at Quigley's Irish Pub who sued their employer for wage theft and wrongful termination. The workers claimed the restaurant wasn't paying them minimum wage or overtime pay as required by law. Most seriously, they alleged that management was routinely changing their time records to show fewer hours worked than they actually put in, which reduced their paychecks. The court ruled in favor of the workers, finding that Quigley's Irish Pub had indeed violated both federal and Illinois wage laws. The judge determined that the restaurant's practice of altering employee time records was frequent and undisputed, meaning the employer couldn't deny it was happening. The court granted summary judgment to the employees, meaning the evidence was so clear that no trial was needed. This ruling matters because it shows that employers cannot manipulate time records to avoid paying proper wages. Workers have strong legal protections when employers try to cheat them out of earned pay, especially minimum wage and overtime. If your employer is changing your time records or not paying you correctly, you may have grounds for a lawsuit under federal and state wage laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.