Skip to main content

Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. Federal Housing Finance Agency

4th CircuitMay 5, 2011No. 09-1973Cited 3 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Traxler, Motz, Keenan
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision allowing the Federal Housing Finance Agency, as conservator of Freddie Mac, to substitute itself as plaintiff in shareholders' derivative actions, effectively precluding the shareholders from pursuing their claims.

What This Ruling Means

# Court Ruling Summary: Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. Federal Housing Finance Agency **What Happened** A group of shareholders, including a Louisiana police retirement fund, sued Freddie Mac (a major mortgage company) for breaking contracts and harming their investments. When the federal government took control of Freddie Mac during the 2008 financial crisis, a government agency called the Federal Housing Finance Agency stepped in as "conservator" to manage the company's affairs. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled that the federal agency had the legal right to take over the shareholders' lawsuit. This decision stopped the shareholders from continuing their case against Freddie Mac themselves. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling affects workers whose retirement funds and pensions invest in major corporations. It shows that when the government takes control of struggling companies, it can prevent individual shareholders—including retirement plans—from pursuing their own legal claims for losses. Workers relying on pension funds should understand that government control of a company may limit their ability to recover investment losses through lawsuits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.