Skip to main content

Cunningham v. New York State Department of Labor

2nd CircuitMay 16, 2011No. 10-2163-cvCited 3 times
Defendant WinNew York State Department of Labor
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Newman, Calabresi, Hall
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationHostile Work Environment

Outcome

Federal appellate court affirmed summary judgment in favor of the New York State Department of Labor, rejecting the employee's Title VII retaliation claim and First Amendment retaliation claim, finding no evidence of pretext and that the employer had legitimate, non-retaliatory reasons for the adverse employment actions.

What This Ruling Means

# Cunningham v. New York State Department of Labor **What Happened** Cunningham filed a lawsuit against the New York State Department of Labor, raising employment law claims. The specific details of the dispute are not fully outlined in the available court records. **What the Court Decided** The court dismissed the case, meaning it ruled that Cunningham's lawsuit could not proceed. No damages were awarded. The case was heard by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (a federal appeals court) and decided on May 16, 2011. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case demonstrates that not all employment disputes result in court victories. When cases are dismissed, workers typically receive no compensation. For employees considering legal action against their employer, this ruling underscores the importance of having strong legal claims supported by evidence. Workers facing workplace issues should carefully evaluate whether their situation has legal merit before pursuing litigation, as courts will dismiss cases that don't meet legal requirements.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Discrimination casesRetaliation casesHostile Work Environment cases

Similar Rulings

Kenneth Davidson v. David Than
C.D. Cal.Jan 2025
Defendant Win
Con Ed v. NLRB
U.S. Supreme CourtDec 1938
Mixed Result
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtFeb 1951
Remanded
Vega
2nd CircuitSep 2015
Remanded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
Read Full OpinionAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from New YorkMore discrimination casesMore government & public sector employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.