Skip to main content

Roadway Express, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

11th CircuitMay 27, 2011No. 10-12445Cited 4 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Dubina, Edmondson, Per Curiam, Wilson
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationWrongful Termination

Outcome

The NLRB prevailed in enforcing its decision that Roadway violated the NLRA by discharging Bianchi for protected union activities and that the union breached its duty of fair representation. The court affirmed the NLRB's award of seven years of back pay and reinstatement.

What This Ruling Means

**Roadway Express v. National Labor Relations Board (2011)** This case involved a labor dispute at Roadway Express, a trucking company, where the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found the company committed unfair labor practices against its workers. The company disagreed with the NLRB's decision and asked a federal appeals court to review it. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals delivered a mixed ruling. The court agreed with some parts of the NLRB's decision against Roadway Express but disagreed with other parts. This means the company was partially successful in challenging the labor board's findings, but the NLRB also had some of its determinations upheld. **What this means for workers:** This case shows that companies can challenge NLRB decisions in federal court, but they don't always win completely. When employers are accused of unfair labor practices, the legal process can be complex with multiple levels of review. Workers should know that even when a labor board rules in their favor, employers may continue fighting the decision in court. However, federal courts don't automatically side with employers - they carefully review each issue. The mixed outcome demonstrates that courts will uphold legitimate NLRB findings while correcting any overreach.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.