Skip to main content

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Consolidated Edison Co.

S.D.N.Y.February 22, 1983No. 80 CIV 1292 (LBS), 80 CIV 8400 (LBS)Cited 11 times
SettlementConsolidated Edison Co.$3,500,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Sand
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
settlement

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationWrongful Termination

Outcome

The EEOC and Consolidated Edison settled an age discrimination case for approximately $3.5 million, providing lifetime annuity payments and lump-sum payments to terminated employees aged 40-65. The settlement was dismissed with prejudice, and the court denied subsequent motions by dissatisfied claimants seeking to opt out or challenge the settlement terms.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued Consolidated Edison, a major utility company, claiming the company illegally fired workers because of their age. The lawsuit alleged that Con Edison discriminated against employees between ages 40 and 65 when making termination decisions, violating federal laws that protect older workers from age-based discrimination. **What the Court Decided** Rather than go to trial, both sides reached a settlement agreement in 1983. Consolidated Edison agreed to pay approximately $3.5 million to compensate the affected workers. The money was distributed through lifetime annuity payments and lump-sum payments to employees who had been terminated. The court approved this settlement and made it final, meaning neither side could back out later. When some workers tried to challenge the settlement terms or withdraw from the agreement, the court denied their requests. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case demonstrates that federal agencies like the EEOC will take legal action against large companies that discriminate based on age. It shows that workers over 40 have strong legal protections, and that age discrimination can result in significant financial penalties for employers. The substantial settlement amount sent a clear message that age-based firing decisions are illegal and costly.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.