Skip to main content

Blaylock v. Johns Hopkins Federal Credit Union

Md. Ct. Spec. App.September 9, 2003No. 1994, Sept. Term, 2001Cited 11 times
SettlementJohns Hopkins Federal Credit Union$7,300 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Hollander, Salmon, Kenney
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of ContractWrongful Termination

Outcome

The parties settled after approximately two and a half years of litigation. Johns Hopkins Federal Credit Union agreed to dismiss its deficiency claim with prejudice, pay Ms. Blaylock $7,300 in damages, and remove adverse credit references. The court subsequently awarded Ms. Blaylock $5,000 in attorney's fees (from her requested $48,951.97) plus $1,038.30 in expenses.

What This Ruling Means

**Blaylock v. Johns Hopkins Federal Credit Union: Employment Settlement** This case involved a dispute between Ms. Blaylock and her former employer, Johns Hopkins Federal Credit Union. Blaylock claimed the credit union wrongfully terminated her employment and breached her employment contract. The credit union had also filed a separate claim against Blaylock for money they said she owed them. After two and a half years of court proceedings, both sides reached a settlement agreement rather than going to trial. Under the settlement terms, Johns Hopkins Federal Credit Union agreed to permanently drop their claim for money against Blaylock, pay her $7,300 in damages, and remove negative marks from her credit report. The court also ordered the credit union to pay $5,000 toward Blaylock's attorney fees and $1,038 in legal expenses. This case shows that workers can successfully challenge wrongful termination and contract violations, even when facing counter-claims from their former employers. The settlement demonstrates that employees may be able to recover damages for improper firing and force employers to correct harmful actions like negative credit reporting. However, lengthy litigation can be costly, as Blaylock's attorney fee award was much less than what she actually spent on legal representation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.