Skip to main content

Johnson v. Metropolitan Sewer Dist.

E.D. Mo.May 22, 1996No. 4:95-cv-02287Cited 15 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Shaw
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to strike

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

Court granted defendant's motion to strike punitive damages in Counts I, III, IV, and V (Title VII, ADA claims) but denied the motion to strike punitive damages in Count II (Section 1981 claim) and denied the motion to strike compensatory damages in Count V, allowing the case to proceed to jury.

What This Ruling Means

**Johnson v. Metropolitan Sewer District: Court Ruling on Damages** This case involved a worker who sued the Metropolitan Sewer District claiming discrimination and retaliation. The employee filed multiple legal claims under different federal laws, including Title VII (which prohibits workplace discrimination), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and Section 1981 (a civil rights law). The court made a mixed ruling on what types of money damages the worker could seek. The judge blocked the employee from asking for punitive damages (extra money meant to punish the employer) under most of their claims, including those filed under Title VII and the ADA. However, the court allowed the worker to continue seeking punitive damages under their Section 1981 claim. The judge also permitted the employee to seek compensatory damages (money to make up for losses) under their ADA claim. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that different anti-discrimination laws have different rules about what damages you can recover. While some federal laws limit punitive damages, others like Section 1981 may offer broader options. Workers facing discrimination should understand that the specific laws under which they file their claims can significantly affect the potential financial recovery available to them.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.