Skip to main content

Armitage v. Dolphin Plumbing & Mechanical, LLC.

M.D. Fla.February 13, 2007No. 8:05-cv-00890
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Patricia C. Fawsett
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Fair Labor Standards Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
bench trial
State
Florida

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court found that Thomas Armitage was not exempt from FLSA overtime requirements as an executive, and that Harry Armitage was an employee (not independent contractor) entitled to overtime compensation. The court calculated overtime pay owed to Harry Armitage based on detailed time records.

What This Ruling Means

**Armitage v. Dolphin Plumbing & Mechanical, LLC - Court Ruling Summary** **What Happened:** A worker named Armitage sued Dolphin Plumbing & Mechanical, LLC for wage theft and violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets minimum wage and overtime pay requirements. Armitage claimed the plumbing company failed to pay proper wages or overtime compensation. **What the Court Decided:** The federal court in Florida dismissed Armitage's case entirely. This means the court threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money to the worker. The court found that Armitage's claims did not meet the legal requirements to proceed. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case shows that winning wage theft claims requires meeting specific legal standards. Workers cannot simply claim they were underpaid - they must provide proper documentation and evidence that clearly shows wage violations occurred. The dismissal demonstrates how challenging it can be to successfully pursue FLSA claims against employers. Workers considering wage theft lawsuits should carefully document their hours worked, pay received, and gather strong evidence before filing. Consulting with an employment attorney can help determine if a case has merit before proceeding to court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.