Skip to main content

Stevenson v. Board of Retirement of the Orange County Employees Retirement System

Cal. Ct. App.June 28, 2010No. G041816Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Fybel
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court affirmed the Orange County Employees Retirement System's decision to exclude overtime compensation from the employee's pension calculation, finding that narcotics investigators did not constitute a separate grade or class under the County Employees Retirement Law.

What This Ruling Means

# Stevenson v. Board of Retirement: Pension Calculation Ruling ## What Happened A narcotics investigator named Stevenson sued the Orange County Employees Retirement System, claiming the agency improperly calculated his pension by leaving out overtime pay. He believed his overtime should have been included in the earnings used to determine his retirement benefits. ## What the Court Decided The court sided with the retirement system. The judges found that narcotics investigators did not qualify as a separate job category under the county's retirement rules. Because of this, the standard pension calculation rules applied to Stevenson—ones that excluded overtime from the calculation. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling clarifies how pensions are calculated for certain government employees. It shows that even specialized positions like narcotics investigator may not receive special treatment in retirement benefits unless the law specifically creates a separate classification for them. Workers in similar roles should understand that their job title alone may not change how their pension is calculated, and overtime might not factor into retirement pay regardless of how much they worked.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.