Skip to main content

Myers v. CROELL REDI-MIX, INC.

N.D. IowaDecember 4, 2009No. 08-CV-2043-LRRCited 1 time
Defendant WinCroell Redi-Mix, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Citation
672 F. Supp. 2d 889, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113089, 108 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 58, 2009 WL 4572737
Judge(s)
Linda R. Reade
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
State
Iowa

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationHarassmentHostile Work Environment

Outcome

Employer prevailed on summary judgment in Title VII sex discrimination and hostile work environment case. Court found plaintiff failed to establish genuine issues of material fact on her claims of sex discrimination, retaliation, disparate treatment, and hostile work environment despite evidence of harassment.

What This Ruling Means

# Myers v. Croell Redi-Mix, Inc. – Case Summary ## What Happened Myers filed an employment law case against Croell Redi-Mix, Inc., a concrete mixing company. The court filing shows a dispute arose between the worker and employer, though specific details about the original complaint are not included in the available case information. ## What the Court Decided The court dismissed the case on December 4, 2009. No damages were awarded to Myers, meaning the court did not order the company to pay any money for compensation. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case illustrates that employment disputes don't always result in court victories, even when workers file lawsuits. When a case is dismissed, it typically means the court found insufficient legal grounds to continue or that procedural requirements weren't met. Workers considering legal action should understand that winning an employment case requires strong evidence and proper legal procedures. Consulting with an employment attorney before filing can help workers understand their rights and the likelihood of success before investing time and resources in litigation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Discrimination casesRetaliation casesHarassment casesHostile Work Environment cases

Similar Rulings

Con Ed v. NLRB
U.S. Supreme CourtDec 1938
Mixed Result
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtFeb 1951
Remanded
Vega
2nd CircuitSep 2015
Remanded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1941
Plaintiff Win
Read Full OpinionMore Croell Redi-Mix, Inc. RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from IowaMore discrimination casesMore manufacturing employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.