Skip to main content

Brady v. Dammer

N.D.N.Y.August 13, 2008No. 04-CV-1126 (LEK/DRH)Cited 6 times
Defendant WinNew York State Department of Taxation and Finance
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Lawrence E. Kahn
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil rights other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationFailure to AccommodateHostile Work EnvironmentWrongful Termination

Outcome

Defendants prevailed on summary judgment. The court dismissed plaintiff's claims under Title I and Title II of the ADA (barred by Eleventh Amendment immunity), Title V (not applicable), § 1983 (failure to establish deprivation of constitutional rights), state human rights law (insufficient evidence of discrimination), and tort claims (qualified immunity and other defenses).

What This Ruling Means

**Brady v. Dammer Employment Discrimination Case** **What Happened:** An employee named Brady filed a discrimination lawsuit against their employer, Dammer, in federal court in New York's Northern District in August 2008. The specific details of what type of discrimination Brady alleged are not provided in the available information, but the case involved claims that the employer treated Brady unfairly based on a protected characteristic. **Court Decision:** The court dismissed Brady's case entirely. This means the judge threw out the lawsuit without ruling in Brady's favor. The court did not award any money damages to Brady, and the employer faced no legal consequences from this particular case. **What This Means for Workers:** This case serves as a reminder that filing a discrimination lawsuit doesn't guarantee success. Workers need to present strong evidence to prove their discrimination claims in court. Simply feeling that discrimination occurred isn't enough - employees must be able to demonstrate that illegal discrimination actually took place according to federal or state employment laws. Workers considering discrimination claims should document incidents carefully and may want to consult with employment attorneys to understand whether their situation meets the legal standards required to win such cases.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.