O'CONNOR v. Pierson
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Chatigny
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 440 Civil rights other
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- Connecticut
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Employer defendants prevailed on summary judgment based on res judicata. The plaintiff's federal substantive due process claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 were barred by a prior state court judgment on overlapping claims, as all elements of res judicata were satisfied.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.