Toledo Blade Newspaper Unions-Blade Pension Plan v. Investment Performance Services, LLC
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Katz
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- motion to dismiss
- State
- Ohio
- Circuit
- Sixth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court granted in part and denied in part the motions to dismiss. The court denied the motion to dismiss Count One (ERISA breach of fiduciary duty claims) as to Shanklin and Suchocki, finding sufficient allegations of fiduciary status, but granted the motion to dismiss Count Two (Ohio negligence claim) as preempted by ERISA.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.