Skip to main content

Tand v. Solomon Schechter Day School of Nassau County

E.D.N.Y.July 7, 2005No. 2:03-cv-05822Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Spatt
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
720 Labor/Management Relations Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Motion to dismiss granted; case dismissed

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Case dismissed; court found insufficient basis for wage and hour claims under FLSA.

What This Ruling Means

# Case Summary: Tand v. Solomon Schechter Day School of Nassau County ## What Happened An employee named Tand filed a lawsuit against Solomon Schechter Day School of Nassau County, claiming the school violated federal wage and hour laws by not paying him properly. Specifically, Tand alleged wage theft—meaning the school failed to pay him wages he was legally entitled to receive. ## What the Court Decided The court dismissed the case, meaning it rejected Tand's claims. The judge determined there was not enough evidence to support his wage violation allegations under federal wage laws. Because the case was dismissed, Tand received no money damages. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case shows that wage theft lawsuits require strong, specific evidence to succeed. If you believe your employer owes you unpaid wages, you'll need clear documentation—like time records, pay stubs, or written agreements about your pay rate—to make a successful legal claim. Simply believing you weren't paid fairly may not be enough. Workers should keep detailed records of their hours and paychecks to protect themselves if disputes arise.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.