Skip to main content

Cerussi v. Union College

S.D.N.Y.June 6, 2001No. 01 CIV 3711 WCCCited 6 times
DismissedUnion College
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
William C. Conner
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationWrongful TerminationBreach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted defendants' motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404, finding transfer appropriate based on convenience of parties, witnesses, and location of operative facts.

What This Ruling Means

I apologize, but I cannot provide a meaningful summary of Cerussi v. Union College based on the limited information provided. The case details only show it was an employment law dispute filed in 2001 in New York Southern District court, but there's no excerpt or content describing what actually happened in the case. To write a helpful summary for workers, I would need information about: - The specific employment dispute (what the employee claimed happened) - The legal issues involved (discrimination, wrongful termination, wage violations, etc.) - How the court ruled - The reasoning behind the decision Without these key details, any summary would be speculation rather than an accurate explanation of the court's actual ruling and its implications for workers. If you can provide the court's opinion or a detailed excerpt from the case, I'd be happy to explain it in plain English and discuss what it means for employees' rights and protections in the workplace.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.