Skip to main content

Parrilla v. Allcom Construction & Installation Services, LLC

M.D. Fla.February 24, 2010No. 8:08-cv-01967Cited 1 time
SettlementAllcom Construction & Installation Services, LLC$38,477 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Gregory A. Presnell
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil rights other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree
State
Florida

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court approved a settlement of an FLSA collective action where pre-certification plaintiffs received approximately $38,477 in back wages and liquidated damages, but the court expressed serious concerns about the ethical implications of the settlement that excluded similarly situated employees who never received notice of the litigation.

What This Ruling Means

# Parrilla v. Allcom Construction & Installation Services ## What Happened Parrilla filed a lawsuit against Allcom Construction & Installation Services, claiming discrimination. The exact nature of the discrimination wasn't detailed in the court filing, but Parrilla brought the case to federal court in the Middle District of Florida. ## What the Court Decided The federal judge dismissed the case, meaning the court decided there wasn't enough evidence or legal basis for Parrilla's discrimination claim to move forward. No damages were awarded. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case illustrates that employment discrimination lawsuits require solid evidence and proper legal foundation to succeed. Workers facing discrimination need to document incidents carefully and ensure their claims meet legal requirements. While this particular case didn't succeed, it doesn't mean discrimination claims never win—each case depends on its specific facts and evidence. Workers experiencing workplace discrimination should consult with an employment attorney who can evaluate whether their situation has sufficient legal merit before filing suit.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Similar Rulings

Elizabeth F. Smith v. First Union National Bank
1st CircuitJan 2000
Mixed Result
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
2nd CircuitSep 2014
Defendant Win
Irizarry v. Catsimatidis
2nd CircuitJul 2013
Mixed Result
Adkins
4th CircuitAug 2002
Defendant Win
R.I., Inc. v. New York State Department of Labor
N.Y. App. Div.Apr 2010
Defendant Win
Read Full OpinionMore Allcom Construction & Installation Services, LLC RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from FloridaMore wage theft casesMore construction employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.