Skip to main content

George Campbell Painting Corp. v. Chao

D. Conn.November 28, 2006No. Civil Action 3-05-cv-00716 (JCH)Cited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Hall
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
790 Other labor litigation
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Secretary of Labor prevailed on summary judgment in a Davis-Bacon Act prevailing wage compliance dispute. The court held that painting contractors had fair warning of prevailing wage requirements and could not challenge wage liability assessments based on lack of notice.

What This Ruling Means

# George Campbell Painting Corp. v. Chao: Case Summary **What Happened** George Campbell Painting Corp. had a dispute involving wage and hour issues and labor standards violations. The case was brought before the court, with claims centering on whether the company properly paid its workers and followed federal labor laws. **What the Court Decided** The court dismissed the case. This means the lawsuit did not proceed to trial, and no damages were awarded to either party. The specific reasons for dismissal are not detailed in the available information. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights that disputes over wages and working conditions can be challenged in court. Workers who believe their employer has violated wage and hour laws—such as underpaying them or failing to provide required breaks—have a legal avenue to seek justice. While this particular case was dismissed, it demonstrates that courts examine whether companies comply with labor standards that protect worker rights and fair compensation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.