Skip to main content

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

D. Md.August 8, 2006No. 05cv0287 RWTCited 11 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Titus
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationDiscrimination

Outcome

The EEOC prevailed on its retaliation claims against Lockheed Martin. The court held that conditioning severance benefits on withdrawal of an EEOC charge and the facial language of the release prohibiting EEOC charges both constituted unlawful retaliation under Title VII, ADEA, and the Equal Pay Act.

What This Ruling Means

**EEOC v. Lockheed Martin Corporation Settlement** This case involved employment discrimination claims against Lockheed Martin Corporation, a major defense contractor. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which is the federal agency that enforces workplace discrimination laws, filed the lawsuit on behalf of workers who alleged they faced unfair treatment based on protected characteristics like race, gender, age, or other factors covered by federal employment laws. Rather than going to trial, Lockheed Martin and the EEOC reached a settlement agreement in 2006. The specific terms of the settlement were not publicly disclosed, and no damages amounts were reported. This means the case was resolved through negotiations between both parties without a court ruling on whether discrimination actually occurred. **What This Means for Workers:** This settlement demonstrates that the EEOC will pursue large corporations when discrimination complaints arise. Even though the case didn't go to trial, it shows that major employers are willing to settle discrimination claims rather than face lengthy court battles. Workers should know they can file complaints with the EEOC if they experience workplace discrimination, and the agency may take action against employers on their behalf, even against large, well-established companies.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.