Skip to main content

Fernandez v. M & L Milevoi Management, Inc.

E.D.N.Y.March 7, 2005No. 1:04-cv-02937Cited 9 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Glasser
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

The court denied defendants' motion to dismiss the Title VII claim against the employer M & L on jurisdictional grounds, holding that the fifteen-employee requirement is not jurisdictional; however, the court granted the motion to dismiss Title VII claims against individual defendants and granted the motion to dismiss the Section 1981 claim as time-barred.

What This Ruling Means

**Fernandez v. M & L Milevoi Management: Discrimination Case Dismissed** This case involved a worker named Fernandez who filed a discrimination lawsuit against their employer, M & L Milevoi Management, Inc. Fernandez claimed they faced illegal discrimination at work, though the specific details of what type of discrimination occurred are not available in the court records. The federal court in New York's Eastern District dismissed Fernandez's case in March 2005. This means the court threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money or other relief to Fernandez. When a court dismisses a case, it typically means either the worker didn't provide enough evidence to support their claims, filed the lawsuit incorrectly, or waited too long to bring the case forward. **What This Means for Workers:** This case serves as a reminder that winning discrimination lawsuits requires strong evidence and proper legal procedures. Workers who believe they've faced discrimination should document incidents carefully, report problems through company channels when possible, and be aware of strict deadlines for filing complaints. While this particular case was unsuccessful, workers still have important legal protections against workplace discrimination and should not be discouraged from pursuing valid claims with proper preparation and legal guidance.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.