Skip to main content

Snyder County Prison Board v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

Pa. Commw. Ct.November 29, 2006Cited 7 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Pellegrini, Jubelirer, Leavitt
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful TerminationBreach of Contract

Outcome

The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court affirmed the trial court's decision that the Snyder County Prison Board committed an unfair labor practice by contracting out food services without exhausting mandatory impasse resolution procedures under the Public Employees Relations Act. The Prison Board was ordered to bargain in good faith, cease the Aramark contract, restore bargaining unit work, reinstate displaced employees, and compensate them for lost wages and benefits.

What This Ruling Means

**Snyder County Prison Board v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board** The Snyder County Prison Board decided to hire an outside company, Aramark, to handle food services at their prison facility. However, they made this decision without following proper procedures required under Pennsylvania's public employee labor laws. The prison workers' union argued that the board was required to negotiate with them first and go through specific dispute resolution steps before making such a significant change that would eliminate union jobs. The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court ruled in favor of the workers and their union. The court found that the prison board committed an unfair labor practice by contracting out the food services work without completing the mandatory negotiation and dispute resolution process. The court ordered the prison board to cancel their contract with Aramark, bring the food services work back to the prison, rehire the displaced workers, and pay them for the wages and benefits they lost during this period. This decision matters for public sector workers because it reinforces that government employers cannot simply bypass union contracts and required bargaining procedures when making decisions that affect workers' jobs. Employers must follow proper negotiation processes before outsourcing work that eliminates union positions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.