Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Union Pacific Railroad
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Winmill
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- Idaho
- Circuit
- Ninth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
EEOC prevailed in establishing that Barry Warburton was disabled under the ADA due to monocular vision (either as actually substantially limiting his ability to see or as treated by UPRR as such a limitation), and UPRR failed to adequately support its direct threat defense because it did not perform a proper individualized assessment as required by ADA regulations.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.