Skip to main content

Herman v. Kvaerner of Philadelphia Shipyard, Inc.

E.D. Pa.November 8, 2006No. 2:05-cv-00475Cited 2 times
Mixed ResultKvaerner Shipyard of Philadelphia, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Anita B. Brody
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
445 Civil rights ADA employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationFailure to AccommodateWrongful Termination

Outcome

Court granted in part and denied in part defendant's summary judgment motion. Genuine issues of material fact remain as to whether plaintiff has a disability under the ADA, whether defendant's stated reason for termination was pretextual, and whether reasonable accommodation was denied; however, plaintiff failed to meet his burden on the 'regarded as disabled' claim.

What This Ruling Means

# Herman v. Kvaerner of Philadelphia Shipyard, Inc. ## What Happened Herman filed a lawsuit against Kvaerner of Philadelphia Shipyard, Inc., claiming he faced discrimination and that the company violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA is a federal law that requires employers to treat workers with disabilities fairly and make reasonable accommodations for them. ## What the Court Decided The court dismissed Herman's case, meaning the judge ruled against him before the case went to trial. No damages were awarded to Herman. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case reminds workers with disabilities that discrimination claims require strong evidence. While the ADA provides important protections, courts won't automatically side with workers simply because they have a disability or believe they were treated unfairly. Workers pursuing discrimination claims should carefully document incidents, gather witness statements, and keep records of communications with their employer. If you believe you've experienced disability discrimination, consider consulting with an employment attorney who can evaluate whether you have sufficient evidence to support your claim.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Discrimination casesFailure to Accommodate casesWrongful Termination cases

Similar Rulings

Con Ed v. NLRB
U.S. Supreme CourtDec 1938
Mixed Result
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtFeb 1951
Remanded
Vega
2nd CircuitSep 2015
Remanded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1941
Plaintiff Win
Read Full OpinionMore Kvaerner Shipyard of Philadelphia, Inc. RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from PennsylvaniaMore discrimination casesMore manufacturing employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.