Skip to main content

Cable v. New York State Thruway Authority

N.D.N.Y.May 18, 1998No. 1:97-cv-01327Cited 9 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
McAvoy
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
790 Other labor litigation
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationHarassmentFailure to AccommodateHostile Work Environment

Outcome

The court granted defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings, finding that most of plaintiff's discrimination and retaliation claims were time-barred under the 300-day filing requirement for Title VII and ADA claims, and that plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies for certain allegations not included in her EEOC charge.

What This Ruling Means

**Cable v. New York State Thruway Authority: Employment Discrimination Case Dismissed** This case involved an employee named Cable who worked for the New York State Thruway Authority and filed a discrimination lawsuit against their employer. Cable claimed that the Thruway Authority had discriminated against them in some way during their employment, though the specific details of the alleged discrimination are not provided in the available information. The federal court in New York's Northern District decided to dismiss Cable's discrimination case in May 1998. This means the court threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money damages to Cable. When a case is dismissed, it typically means either the employee failed to prove their claims, didn't follow proper legal procedures, or the court found other legal reasons why the case couldn't proceed. **What This Means for Workers:** This case shows that simply filing a discrimination claim doesn't guarantee success in court. Workers who believe they've faced workplace discrimination need to carefully document incidents and follow proper procedures when filing complaints. It's important to understand that discrimination cases can be challenging to prove, and courts require specific evidence to support such claims. Workers considering discrimination lawsuits should consult with employment attorneys to understand their rights and the strength of their potential case.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.