Skip to main content

Martinez-Hernandez v. BUTTERBALL, LLC

E.D.N.C.September 2, 2008No. 5:07-cv-00174Cited 14 times
Mixed ResultButterball, LLC
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Malcolm J. Howard
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Fair Labor Standards Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftBreach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted defendant's motion for partial summary judgment on FLSA preemption grounds, dismissing plaintiffs' payday statute claims to the extent they sought compensation for FLSA-mandated minimum wage and overtime. However, the court denied summary judgment on state law claims for compensation at rates exceeding federal minimums and preserved certain donning-and-doffing claims for further proceedings.

What This Ruling Means

**Martinez-Hernandez v. Butterball, LLC: Court Dismisses Wage Theft Case** This case involved a worker named Martinez-Hernandez who sued poultry company Butterball, claiming the company violated federal wage laws. The employee alleged that Butterball failed to pay proper wages as required under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets rules for minimum wage and overtime pay. The court dismissed the case, meaning Martinez-Hernandez did not win their lawsuit against Butterball. No damages were awarded to the worker. The court filing from September 2008 does not provide details about why the case was dismissed or the specific wage violations that were claimed. **What This Means for Workers:** This case shows that winning wage theft lawsuits can be challenging, even when workers believe their employer violated federal pay laws. Workers who suspect wage violations should carefully document their hours worked, pay received, and any potential violations before filing a complaint. It's also important to understand that courts require strong evidence to prove wage theft claims. While this particular case was unsuccessful, workers still have the right to file complaints with the Department of Labor or pursue legal action when employers fail to pay proper wages.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.