Skip to main content

Ellsworth v. Pot Luck Enterprises, Inc.

M.D. Tenn.June 5, 2009No. Case 3:08-cv-0647Cited 1 time
Defendant WinPot Luck Enterprises, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Hostile Work EnvironmentHarassmentRetaliationDiscrimination

Outcome

The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment on the hostile work environment and retaliation claims, finding insufficient evidence of severe or pervasive harassment and inadequate complaint procedures that would support liability, though discovery disputes were left for further resolution.

What This Ruling Means

# Ellsworth v. Pot Luck Enterprises, Inc. — Case Summary **What Happened** An employee named Ellsworth filed a discrimination lawsuit against Pot Luck Enterprises, Inc. The case was brought to federal court in Tennessee in June 2009. While the specific details of the discrimination claim aren't detailed in the court records provided, Ellsworth believed he or she was treated unfairly at work based on a protected characteristic. **What the Court Decided** The court dismissed the case, meaning the lawsuit did not proceed to trial. No damages (money compensation) were awarded to Ellsworth. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case illustrates that discrimination lawsuits require strong evidence and proper legal foundation to move forward in court. When cases are dismissed early, it typically means the court found problems with how the claim was presented—not necessarily that discrimination didn't occur. Workers facing discrimination should ensure they have solid documentation and consult with an employment attorney to understand what evidence they need before filing a lawsuit. Understanding proper legal procedures can significantly impact the success of workplace rights claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Hostile Work Environment casesHarassment casesRetaliation casesDiscrimination cases

Similar Rulings

Con Ed v. NLRB
U.S. Supreme CourtDec 1938
Mixed Result
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtFeb 1951
Remanded
Vega
2nd CircuitSep 2015
Remanded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1941
Plaintiff Win
Read Full OpinionMore Pot Luck Enterprises, Inc. RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from TennesseeMore hostile work environment casesMore retail employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.