Skip to main content

Eliserio v. FLOYDADA HOUSING AUTHORITY

S.D. Tex.March 28, 2005No. CIV.A. L-05-04
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Kazen
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Texas

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful TerminationWage Theft

Outcome

The motion to dismiss for improper venue was denied, but the court ordered further briefing on the motion to transfer venue.

What This Ruling Means

**Eliserio v. Floydada Housing Authority: Court Allows Worker's Case to Proceed** This case involved a worker who sued the Floydada Housing Authority, claiming the employer violated housing codes and broke their contract. The employer tried to get the case thrown out by arguing it was filed in the wrong court location. The court refused to dismiss the case, ruling that the worker had properly filed the lawsuit in the correct venue under federal worker protection laws. However, the employer made a second request to move the case to a different court, and the judge asked both sides to provide more information before making a decision on that issue. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that courts will protect employees' right to file lawsuits in appropriate locations when they believe their employers have violated housing standards or broken employment contracts. The decision demonstrates that employers cannot easily escape accountability by claiming a case was filed in the wrong place. Workers should know they have legal options when housing authorities or other employers fail to meet their obligations, though the specific location where they can file may depend on various legal factors that require careful consideration.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.