Mills v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Schwelb, Farrell, Ruiz
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court vacated the Director's decision denying temporary total disability benefits and remanded the case for further proceedings, finding that the agency failed to properly consider Ms. Mills' substantial evidence of lost wages from a professional basketball opportunity in Turkey that she could not accept due to her work-related injury.
What This Ruling Means
Mills v. DC Department of Employment Services
What Happened:
Ms. Mills, a professional basketball player for the Washington Mystics (WNBA), suffered a work-related injury that prevented her from playing. She applied for temporary disability benefits from DC's workers' compensation system, but the agency denied her claim. Mills had evidence showing she lost substantial wages because her injury forced her to turn down a lucrative basketball contract to play professionally in Turkey.
What the Court Decided:
The court overturned the agency's denial and sent the case back for a new review. The court ruled that the Department of Employment Services failed to properly consider Mills' evidence of lost wages from the Turkish basketball opportunity. The agency needed to take a closer look at how her work injury directly caused her financial losses.
Why This Matters for Workers:
This case shows that workers' compensation should cover lost wages from missed opportunities, not just regular paychecks. If a work injury prevents you from taking a better job or pursuing other income opportunities, those losses may count toward your benefits. Workers should document all potential income they've lost due to workplace injuries, including job offers or contracts they couldn't accept because of their condition.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
1. Workers' Compensation — Seagraves test — injured employee's right to continuing benefits — termination for misconduct Our Supreme Court adopts the Seagraves , 123 N.C. App. 228 (2003), test for determining an injured employee's right to continuing workers' compensation benefits after being…
1. Workers' Compensation — sale of business — continuing jurisdiction of Industrial Commission An employer who had sold its paper mill and workers' compensation liabilities after an employee's work-related accident continued to be subject to the jurisdiction of the Industrial Commission with regard…
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.