Etienne v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Ellen B. Burns
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 442 Civil rights jobs
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- Connecticut
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Wal-Mart's motion for summary judgment was granted on all counts. The court found plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination under Title VII, as he was not performing his job satisfactorily due to failure to prevent or report significant inventory shrinkage, and the adverse actions (suspension and demotion) were justified by legitimate business reasons unrelated to race.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.