Skip to main content

Kennedy v. Critical Intervention Services, Inc.

M.D. Fla.March 11, 2002No. 8:00-cv-01974Cited 1 time
Plaintiff WinCritical Intervention Services, Inc.$25,097.56 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
McCoun
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Fair Labor Standards Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict
State
Florida

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiff prevailed on FLSA overtime compensation claim and was awarded $12,548.78 in unpaid overtime pay plus an equal amount of liquidated damages ($12,548.78), totaling $25,097.56. The court found defendant failed to demonstrate good faith belief that plaintiff was exempt from FLSA overtime requirements.

What This Ruling Means

**The Dispute** Kennedy, an employee at Critical Intervention Services, sued his employer for not paying him overtime wages he was legally owed. The company claimed Kennedy was exempt from overtime rules, meaning they didn't have to pay him extra for working more than 40 hours per week. **The Court's Decision** The court ruled in Kennedy's favor, finding that Critical Intervention Services had wrongfully denied him overtime pay. The judge awarded Kennedy $12,548.78 in unpaid overtime wages, plus an additional $12,548.78 in liquidated damages (a penalty that doubles the amount owed), for a total of $25,097.56. The court determined that the company could not prove it had a good faith belief that Kennedy was actually exempt from overtime requirements under federal law. **What This Means for Workers** This case shows that employers cannot simply declare workers "exempt" from overtime without proper justification. When companies wrongfully deny overtime pay, they may have to pay double damages—both the wages owed and an equal penalty amount. Workers who believe they're being improperly classified as exempt from overtime should know that courts take these violations seriously and that significant financial remedies are available.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.