Skip to main content

Keenan Hopkins Schmidt & Stowell Contractors, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.

M.D. Fla.September 1, 2009No. 8:07-cv-00383Cited 9 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Wiseman
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Fair Labor Standards Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
State
Florida

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted Continental Casualty Company's motion for summary judgment, dismissing Keenan Hopkins Schmidt & Stowell Contractors' breach of insurance contract claim. The court found Continental was entitled to judgment as a matter of law based on the express terms of the insurance policy.

What This Ruling Means

**What This Case Was About** Keenan Hopkins Schmidt & Stowell Contractors sued their insurance company, Continental Casualty Company, claiming the insurer broke their insurance contract. The construction company believed Continental should have provided coverage under their policy but was denied. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled in favor of Continental Casualty Company and threw out the contractor's lawsuit. The judge found that when they carefully read the actual language in the insurance policy, Continental was legally correct to deny coverage. The court said Continental won "as a matter of law," meaning the policy terms were so clear that no trial was needed. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights how important it is to understand exactly what insurance policies cover. When companies have disputes with their insurers, it can affect workers if the business faces financial problems or cuts costs. Workers should be aware that insurance coverage isn't automatic – it depends on specific policy language. If you're ever covered by employer-provided insurance, it's worth understanding what is and isn't included in your coverage, as insurance companies will strictly follow the written terms of their policies.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.