Skip to main content

Errante v. Kadean Real Estate Service, Inc.

Mo. Ct. App.January 10, 1984No. 46477Cited 12 times
Plaintiff WinKadean Real Estate Service, Inc.$2,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Pudlowski, Crist, Simon
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict

Related Laws

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Plaintiffs prevailed on their breach of contract claim and recovered $2,000 in earnest money plus prejudgment interest. The court affirmed the directed verdict against defendants' counterclaim and upheld the jury's award.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** This case involved a dispute between plaintiffs and Kadean Real Estate Service, Inc. over a breach of contract. While the specific details of the contract dispute aren't provided in the available information, the case centered on earnest money that the plaintiffs claimed they were owed. The real estate company apparently filed a counterclaim against the plaintiffs, suggesting they believed the plaintiffs owed them money instead. **What the Court Decided:** The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. A jury awarded them $2,000 in earnest money plus additional interest that had built up over time. The court also dismissed the real estate company's counterclaim, meaning the company's argument that the plaintiffs owed them money was rejected. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case demonstrates that courts will enforce contract terms when employers or business partners fail to meet their obligations. Workers and individuals can successfully recover money they're owed when they have valid contracts, even when facing larger companies. The case also shows that businesses cannot simply file counterclaims to avoid paying what they legitimately owe. Having proper documentation and legal representation can help workers protect their contractual rights.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.