Skip to main content

Teamsters Local 639-Employers Health Trust v. Davis

D.D.C.September 9, 2010No. Civil Action 10-964 (ESH)Cited 1 time
Plaintiff WinLorenzo Davis$24,845.81 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Ellen Segal Huvelle
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted default judgment in favor of the ERISA Health Trust against a plan participant who failed to reimburse the trust under a subrogation agreement after receiving a third-party settlement.

What This Ruling Means

# Court Ruling Summary: Teamsters Local 639-Employers Health Trust v. Davis ## What Happened Lorenzo Davis received medical benefits through a health insurance plan managed by Teamsters Local 639-Employers Health Trust. When Davis failed to pay back certain medical costs he owed to the plan, the Health Trust sued him to recover the money. Davis did not respond to the lawsuit. ## What the Court Decided Because Davis did not respond to the case, the court ruled in favor of the Health Trust by default. Davis was ordered to pay $24,845.81 in unpaid medical benefits and related costs. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case shows that when workers receive health benefits through their union or employer plans, they may be required to repay certain medical costs under specific circumstances. Workers should take legal notices seriously—ignoring a lawsuit can result in automatic losses and financial judgments against them. If you receive a notice about disputed medical benefits, responding promptly and seeking help is important to protect your rights.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.