Skip to main content

Teamsters Local 639-Employers Health Trust v. Davis

D.D.C.September 9, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2010-0964
Plaintiff WinWashington Wholesale Liquors Company, LLC$24,845.81 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Ellen S. Huvelle
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defendant Lorenzo Davis in the amount of $24,845.81 for breach of a subrogation agreement requiring repayment of health benefits advanced by the Teamsters Local 639-Employers Health Trust.

What This Ruling Means

**Health Trust Wins Repayment Case Against Former Employee** This case involved a dispute over health benefits between a Teamsters union health trust and a former employee named Lorenzo Davis, who worked at Washington Wholesale Liquors Company. The health trust had paid Davis's medical bills upfront, but Davis had signed an agreement saying he would pay the money back if he later received a settlement or award from another source (like an insurance claim or lawsuit). When Davis apparently received such money but didn't repay the health trust as promised, the trust sued him for breaking this repayment agreement. The court sided with the health trust and ordered Davis to pay back $24,845.81. This happened through a "default judgment," meaning Davis didn't respond to the lawsuit or show up to defend himself in court. **What This Means for Workers:** This case shows that when you receive health benefits from a union trust or employer, you may be required to sign agreements promising to repay those benefits under certain circumstances. If you later receive money from an insurance settlement, workers' compensation, or lawsuit related to the same medical issue, you might have to pay back the health benefits you received. Always read these agreements carefully and follow through on any repayment obligations to avoid being sued.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.