Skip to main content

Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 957

S.D. OhioMay 7, 2001No. C-3-97-392Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Merz
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
contempt motion
State
Ohio

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court found that Dayton Newspapers violated the arbitration award enforcement order by terminating Patricia Bonner after she was reinstated, constituting civil contempt. The court ordered reinstatement with back pay and attorney's fees.

What This Ruling Means

Based on the limited information provided, I cannot write a complete summary of the Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 957 case. The excerpt you've shared doesn't include the actual court ruling details, case facts, or the court's decision. To properly explain this employment law case for workers, I would need: - The specific dispute between Dayton Newspapers and the Teamsters union - What legal issues were at stake - How the court ruled - The reasoning behind the decision What I can tell you is that this appears to be a case from 2001 involving a newspaper company and a local Teamsters union, filed in what seems to be an Ohio court. Teamsters unions typically represent workers in transportation, logistics, and various other industries, so this likely involved workplace rights or union-related issues. If you can provide the actual case details or court opinion, I'd be happy to break down what happened, the court's decision, and what it means for workers in plain English. Employment law cases involving unions often set important precedents about workers' rights to organize and negotiate with their employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.