Skip to main content

Trustees of the Teamsters Union Local No. 142 Pension Trust Fund v. McAllister, Inc.

INNDMarch 17, 2009No. 2:08-cr-00088Cited 3 times
Plaintiff WinMcAllister, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Paul R. Cherry
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
State
Indiana

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of ContractWage Theft

Outcome

The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, finding that the employer failed to pay required pension and training trust fund contributions under the collective bargaining agreement and ERISA, and awarded damages including unpaid contributions, interest, liquidated damages, and attorney's fees.

What This Ruling Means

# Court Ruling Summary: Teamsters Union Pension Fund v. McAllister, Inc. ## What Happened The Teamsters Union pension fund sued McAllister, Inc. because the company failed to pay required contributions into pension and training trust funds. These contributions are promised to workers under their union contract and federal law. The employer was supposed to set aside money to fund retirement benefits and worker training programs, but did not make these required payments. ## What the Court Decided The court sided with the union and found McAllister, Inc. guilty of breaking its contract obligations. The company had to pay back all the missing contributions plus interest. The employer was also ordered to pay additional damages and cover the union's legal fees for bringing the case. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling protects union workers' retirement security. It shows that employers cannot simply ignore their promises to fund pension plans. When companies fail to make required contributions, workers lose benefits they've earned through their labor. This decision reinforces that courts will enforce these legal obligations and hold employers financially accountable for shortfalls.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.