Skip to main content

Van Hoven v. PRE-EMPLOYEE. COM, INC.

Wash. Ct. App.July 13, 2010No. 28382-8-III
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Kulik
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed summary judgment for Pre-Employee.com, holding that RCW 19.182.080(6) bars defamation claims against consumer reporting agencies absent malice or willful intent to injure, and plaintiff failed to establish damages.

What This Ruling Means

**What happened:** An employee sued Pre-Employee.com, a background check company, for defamation after the company provided information about them to Central Washington Hospital. The worker claimed the background check report contained false or damaging information that hurt their reputation and employment prospects. **What the court decided:** The court ruled in favor of Pre-Employee.com and threw out the case. The judge found that Washington state law protects background check companies from defamation lawsuits unless the worker can prove the company acted with malice (intentional harm) or deliberately tried to injure them. The court also noted that the worker failed to prove they suffered any actual financial damages from the allegedly false information. **Why this matters for workers:** This ruling makes it very difficult for workers to sue background check companies for defamation in Washington state. Even if a background report contains incorrect information, workers must prove the company intentionally meant to harm them - not just that they made a mistake. Workers also need to show concrete financial losses, like lost wages or job opportunities. This means workers have limited legal options when background check companies make errors that could damage their employment chances.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.