Skip to main content

Peter v. Lincoln Technical Institute, Inc.

E.D. Pa.October 7, 2002No. 2:01-cv-05949Cited 44 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Van Antwerpen
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationFailure to AccommodateWrongful TerminationRetaliation

Outcome

Plaintiff's ADA and PHRA disability discrimination claims were dismissed as time-barred (filed more than 300 days after termination). Summary judgment was granted to employer on these counts. FMLA claims were not dismissed at summary judgment stage.

What This Ruling Means

**Peter v. Lincoln Technical Institute, Inc. - Employment Discrimination Case** This case involved a discrimination lawsuit filed by an employee named Peter against Lincoln Technical Institute, Inc. in 2002. Peter claimed that his employer had discriminated against him, though the specific details of the alleged discrimination are not provided in the available court records. The court ultimately dismissed Peter's case, meaning the lawsuit was thrown out and Peter did not receive any monetary compensation or other remedies. When a discrimination case is dismissed, it typically means either the employee failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, didn't follow proper legal procedures, or the court determined the employer's actions didn't violate anti-discrimination laws. For workers, this case serves as a reminder that winning discrimination lawsuits requires strong evidence and proper legal procedures. Simply feeling discriminated against isn't enough - employees must be able to prove their case met the legal standards for discrimination under employment law. Workers who believe they've faced discrimination should document incidents carefully, follow their company's complaint procedures when appropriate, and consider consulting with an employment attorney to understand their rights and the strength of their potential case before filing a lawsuit.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.