Skip to main content

Canada Life Assurance Co. v. Converium Rückerversicherung (Deutschland) AG

S.D.N.Y.April 19, 2002No. 01 CIV. 11767(WHP)Cited 6 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Pauley
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted defendant Converium's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that the Air Stabilization Act's jurisdictional grant does not extend to retrocessional reinsurance disputes arising from September 11th losses.

What This Ruling Means

I apologize, but I cannot provide a meaningful summary of this court ruling because the information provided is insufficient. The case excerpt is completely blank, and the basic details show: **What we know:** - This appears to be a case between Canada Life Assurance Co. and a German reinsurance company - It was filed in a New York federal court in 2002 - It's listed as involving employment law - The outcome is listed as "unknown" - No damages are reported **What's missing:** Without the actual court ruling or case details, I cannot determine what employment dispute occurred, what the court decided, or what it means for workers. **For workers:** This highlights an important point - when researching employment law cases, you need access to the full court decision or detailed case summary to understand how it might affect your rights. Case titles and basic filing information alone don't tell you what legal principles were established or how they might apply to your situation. If you're researching employment rights, look for complete court decisions or reliable legal summaries from established sources rather than incomplete case listings.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.